RI-Consulting Customs Practice lawyers have successfully completed a project on pre-trial appeal and invalidation of the decision of the customs authority, according to which our Client, the largest woodworking plant, was refused to release the declaration. Afterwards legal proceedings were instituted against the Client under p. 1 Article 16.2 of the Administrative Offenses Code of Russia.

What is unique about our case approach? This is a solution to the client's individual business problems, when in principle no templates or standard approaches are applied. Our Client has the right to expect a unique plan of action, based on the specific situation and developed specifically for him. Accordingly, the opponent is deprived of the opportunity to foresee the chosen method of protection of rights and interests, based on analogy or previous experience. At our firm, the lawyer is immersed in a fundamental analysis of the problem, comparing Client's goals and prior actions. We examine every legal component of the case in detail.

And this is not just an unsubstantiated statement. How did we manage to win the case? To dive into the details. Thorough study of all conditions of Customs Code of the Eurasian Economic Union 125, under which the customs authority produces the release of goods. Thanks to the legal position developed by Denis Rudenko, Managing Partner of the customs law practice, our Client's demands were satisfied and during the departmental appeal we proved the legitimacy of the Client, protected his rights, the superior customs authority recognized the customs decision as unlawful and overturned.