RI-CONSULTING HAS WON THE CASE TO DEFEND OUR CLIENT TO RECOVER DAMAGES

In a recent corporate dispute, RI-Consulting attorneys successfully defended in the courts of three instances (Central District) the interests of our Client - the former director of a company that owns and manages commercial real estate. A member of the company filed a claim for recovery of damages in the amount of 46 million rubles from the former director of this company - our Client.

IMPORTANT:

The Director of the company is responsible for transactions made on behalf of the legal entity. If damage is caused to the company by his bad faith actions, he must reimburse it at the request of the legal entity or its founders.

This fair provision in practice can be used in corporate wars to hold the Director, who has become undesirable, accountable. In this case, even reasonable and good-faith actions of the Director can become grounds for the court. The right strategy in this case largely determines the outcome of the case, which can have very negative consequences for the Director, and even turn into a criminal case.

WHAT WE DID:

Given the persistent and divisive corporate conflict between the participant and the former Director, Managing Partner Elena Gladysheva and the Company's Attorneys developed a multi-stage strategy to defend the Client's interests, including the establishment of important circumstances for the case in other litigation, as well as using non-judicial corporate procedures, by implementing which we won the claim - the recovery of damages against our Client was denied in full, the court acts entered into legal force. Plaintiff failed to prove bad faith or unreasonableness of our Client's actions/inaction that caused adverse consequences for the legal entity.

ON THE RE-CONSULTING APPROACH AND PRACTICE IN THIS CATEGORY OF CASES:

RI-Consulting specializes in protecting businesses and top managers, so we have extensive experience in this category of cases. We know how to hold directors liable and how to avoid liability if an attempt is made to recover damages from the head of the company and blame them for their allegedly dishonest actions.

In conclusion, we note that even the most respectable manager is not immune from such lawsuits. Some of the founders of his actions may seem suspicious, and there may be cases of deliberate attempts to smear a person and hang a debt on him. In addition, no one is immune from mistakes, and they can be very expensive.

If you have been sued for recovery of damages or, on the contrary, need to recover them from a dishonest director, you can always apply to us for advice (Elena Gladysheva, Managing Partner, +7 (495) 632-14-50, email: info@ri-consulting.ru). As the outcome of this case largely depends on timely and correct actions in the legal field.

Other publications
VEDOMOSTI. LARGEST SUGAR PRODUCER FOUND GUILTY OF CREATING SPECULATIVE DEMAND
VEDOMOSTI. LARGEST SUGAR PRODUCER FOUND GUILTY OF CREATING SPECULATIVE DEMAND

17.02.2023

Earlier the FAS started anti-cartel inspections of the largest sugar producers - Rusagro Group LLC, Rusagro-Center LLC, Prodimex LLC, GC Dominant LLC, Trade House Dominant LLC and ChekhovSugar LLC, as well as the Union of Sugar Producers of Russia non-profit organization. The FAS also audited market...

THE COURT REJECTED CREDITOR'S APPLICATION TO CHALLENGE THE TRANSACTION OF ASSETS WITHDRAWAL FROM THE LOSS CENTER
THE COURT REJECTED CREDITOR'S APPLICATION TO CHALLENGE THE TRANSACTION OF ASSETS WITHDRAWAL FROM THE LOSS CENTER

13.02.2023

The Supreme Court has consolidated the issue of qualification of transactions in bankruptcy proceedings. The application of the concept of "higher standard of proof" must be justified and cannot be applied arbitrarily. Managing Partner of RI-Consulting, Advocate Elena Gladysheva, evaluates the...

ADVOKATSKAYA GAZETA. FORMALISM IS INADMISSIBLE. THE SUPREME COURT HAS CLARIFIED TO THE COURTS THAT A CHANGE IN THE LEGAL ENTITY FORM SHOULD NOT DEPRIVE A FORMER SHAREHOLDER OF HIS PROPERTY
ADVOKATSKAYA GAZETA. FORMALISM IS INADMISSIBLE. THE SUPREME COURT HAS CLARIFIED TO THE COURTS THAT A CHANGE IN THE LEGAL ENTITY FORM SHOULD NOT DEPRIVE A FORMER SHAREHOLDER OF HIS PROPERTY

11.01.2023

Elena Gladyysheva, Advocate, Managing Partner of RI-Consulting, and Vladimir Krylov, Senior Lawyer, Head of Corporate Law Department of RI-Consulting on case No. A40-213998/2021. The Russian Supreme Court clarified to lower courts the rules of compensation for losses in the case when a former...

Office in Moscow Phone: +7 (495) 632-14-50. Duty Lawyer (24/7): +7 (985) 307-31-76. E-mail: info@ri-consulting.ru Address: 22 Baumanskaya str., office 201