KOMMERSANT. ESCAPE WITH OBSTACLES. HOW AND TO WHOM CAN FOREIGNERS TRANSFER BUSINESS IN RUSSIA?

ELENA GLADYSHEVA, MANAGING PARTNER OF RI-CONSULTING

Against the background of harsh sanctions imposed against the Russian Federation in connection with the military actions in Ukraine, a number of foreign companies announced the withdrawal from the country, the suspension or "transfer" of business. Kommersant discussed with lawyers what this may mean, what legal mechanisms exist, and whether foreigners can create conditions in advance to return to the Russian market.

After the start of the military operation in Ukraine, many international companies announced that they were suspending operations in Russia or quitting altogether, with new names appearing every day. Some, however, have specified that they plan to "hand over Russian business".

In particular, on March 15, British tobacco company Imperial Brands (Davidoff, Richmond, and Gitanes brands) explained that it had "begun negotiations with a Russian legal entity to transfer the business in Russia," would take measures to maintain "uninterrupted operations" of the company, and would continue to pay salaries to employees "until all transfer processes are completed."

British American Tobacco (BAT, Dunhill, Lucky Strike and Rothmans brands) also announced its withdrawal from Russia: "We have begun the process of quickly transferring our Russian business in full compliance with international and local laws. We will continue to pay the salaries of our 2,500 employees and do everything we can to make sure they have jobs in the future." As Kommersant found out, the business will be managed by BAT's distributor and longtime partner, SNS Group, which promises to maintain production and supplies at the same level.

Philip Morris International announced on March 24 that it is considering restructuring options, including the possible transfer of assets. On March, 28 the Dutch brewery company Heineken also announced its search for a new owner for the Russian business.

Managing Partner of RI-Consulting Elena Gladysheva on what risks arise for Russian business beneficiaries (who are under Western sanctions) when transferring their assets to "nominees" (top managers of the company, etc.) and what are the ways to protect their interests, so that then the nominee does not cheat and or appropriate the asset? What disposal/transfer options are possible? Will foreign companies from unfriendly countries (see the updated list of the government) receive permission from the Rights Commission to sell their shares in Russian subsidiaries or stakes in LLCs, to repo or option transactions or to withdraw from shareholders/participants? In which case are there more chances to approve such a transaction? And will foreign companies even apply to the Rights Commission for such permission or can they ignore this requirement? If they ignore it and sell shares/participatory interest without approval, what are the consequences? Will it be possible to cancel the sale or not?

Read more  

Other publications
VEDOMOSTI. LARGEST SUGAR PRODUCER FOUND GUILTY OF CREATING SPECULATIVE DEMAND
VEDOMOSTI. LARGEST SUGAR PRODUCER FOUND GUILTY OF CREATING SPECULATIVE DEMAND

17.02.2023

Earlier the FAS started anti-cartel inspections of the largest sugar producers - Rusagro Group LLC, Rusagro-Center LLC, Prodimex LLC, GC Dominant LLC, Trade House Dominant LLC and ChekhovSugar LLC, as well as the Union of Sugar Producers of Russia non-profit organization. The FAS also audited market...

THE COURT REJECTED CREDITOR'S APPLICATION TO CHALLENGE THE TRANSACTION OF ASSETS WITHDRAWAL FROM THE LOSS CENTER
THE COURT REJECTED CREDITOR'S APPLICATION TO CHALLENGE THE TRANSACTION OF ASSETS WITHDRAWAL FROM THE LOSS CENTER

13.02.2023

The Supreme Court has consolidated the issue of qualification of transactions in bankruptcy proceedings. The application of the concept of "higher standard of proof" must be justified and cannot be applied arbitrarily. Managing Partner of RI-Consulting, Advocate Elena Gladysheva, evaluates the...

ADVOKATSKAYA GAZETA. FORMALISM IS INADMISSIBLE. THE SUPREME COURT HAS CLARIFIED TO THE COURTS THAT A CHANGE IN THE LEGAL ENTITY FORM SHOULD NOT DEPRIVE A FORMER SHAREHOLDER OF HIS PROPERTY
ADVOKATSKAYA GAZETA. FORMALISM IS INADMISSIBLE. THE SUPREME COURT HAS CLARIFIED TO THE COURTS THAT A CHANGE IN THE LEGAL ENTITY FORM SHOULD NOT DEPRIVE A FORMER SHAREHOLDER OF HIS PROPERTY

11.01.2023

Elena Gladyysheva, Advocate, Managing Partner of RI-Consulting, and Vladimir Krylov, Senior Lawyer, Head of Corporate Law Department of RI-Consulting on case No. A40-213998/2021. The Russian Supreme Court clarified to lower courts the rules of compensation for losses in the case when a former...

Office in Moscow Phone: +7 (495) 632-14-50. Duty Lawyer (24/7): +7 (985) 307-31-76. E-mail: info@ri-consulting.ru Address: 22 Baumanskaya str., office 201