The Supreme Court pointed out that the contractor, instead of eliminating the deficiencies identified, filed a lawsuit to recover the difference between the contract price and the amounts paid by the customer.
Elena Gladysheva, Advocate, Managing Partner of RI-Consulting explains the legal position of the Supreme Court. What is the most important conclusion of the Supreme Court? How common is this problem in practice?
Read more about the background of the case and the lawyer's opinion in the publication
17.02.2023
Earlier the FAS started anti-cartel inspections of the largest sugar producers - Rusagro Group LLC, Rusagro-Center LLC, Prodimex LLC, GC Dominant LLC, Trade House Dominant LLC and ChekhovSugar LLC, as well as the Union of Sugar Producers of Russia non-profit organization. The FAS also audited market...
13.02.2023
The Supreme Court has consolidated the issue of qualification of transactions in bankruptcy proceedings. The application of the concept of "higher standard of proof" must be justified and cannot be applied arbitrarily. Managing Partner of RI-Consulting, Advocate Elena Gladysheva, evaluates the...
11.01.2023
Elena Gladyysheva, Advocate, Managing Partner of RI-Consulting, and Vladimir Krylov, Senior Lawyer, Head of Corporate Law Department of RI-Consulting on case No. A40-213998/2021. The Russian Supreme Court clarified to lower courts the rules of compensation for losses in the case when a former...